Marilyn Butler’s idea is that
Emma’s high status gives her more leeway to act badly – but also that her bad actions
are her own moral responsibility. On one hand, this seems reasonable; certainly
after this election season it seems like elites can get away with things
that ordinary people could never do. But at the same time, I wonder whether
Austen is actually challenging the idea that women lived their lives in the way
that men imagined they do. I don’t know much about any of Austen’s other
heroines, but it may be that women always do far more then society tells them they
are supposed to. You could argue that poor women have more leeway because they
don’t have class expectations thrust upon them.
Emma definitely does have advantages due to status. For instance, her wealth (and doting father) may mean that she can vow to remain single, because she
does not have to marry for economic support. But I only think the first half of
Butler’s statement may be true. I haven’t seen yet that Emma takes “moral
responsibility” for her bad behavior, like when she discouraged the union of
Mr. Martin and Harriet due to her own prejudices and self-interest, or when she gossips about Jane's and Mr. Dixon's supposed attraction to each other.