I was not that impressed by either set of arguments related
to human cloning because I think it is probably a more complex issue than
a short FAQ can answer. But I do believe that science’s ability to do something
sometimes runs ahead of whether or not it should do it. For instance, the Manhattan
Project to build the atomic bomb: J. Robert Oppenheimer really regretted being
the father of the atomic bomb later.
I don’t think cloning would destroy the world,
but Never Let Me Go raises one of the
biggest objections, which is that human beings are generally not kind to people
they consider inferior. I could imagine that there would be serious concerns about
how we treat cloned people. The characters in the book so far seem mostly resigned
to their fate as donors, but they were raised that way with no other options. Unlike in the novel, I think that
it is more likely scientists would work to clone individual organs rather than whole
human beings – in terms of organ donation, that seems like a much better
option.